Street to SkyCities, read from the pavement upward

Streets

Verges Are The Cheapest Drainage A Street Has

Grass strips beside a road absorb runoff, hold trees and store snow, and replacing them with paving transfers all of those functions to systems that cost money to build.

A person crosses a street in downtown Manhattan, New York during winter.
Photograph by Sasha Zilov via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

A grass verge looks like leftover space. In drainage, planting and maintenance terms it is doing several jobs that have to be paid for once it is removed.

It absorbs water before it reaches a pipe

Rain falling on a verge infiltrates rather than running to a gully, so it never enters the drainage network and never contributes to the peak flow during a storm.

Runoff from the adjacent carriageway can also be directed into it, which reduces the volume the pipes must carry and filters out sediment and oil in the process.

Achieving the same effect with engineered systems means tanks, filters and pipework, all of which are designed, built and maintained at a cost the grass did not incur.

It is the only place a street tree can grow properly

Trees planted in a verge have access to a continuous volume of uncompacted soil, which is what determines how large they eventually get and how long they live.

Trees planted in pits within paving are limited to the soil in the pit, and their growth stalls once roots reach the edge of it.

The difference in canopy between the two situations after twenty years is substantial, and it is decided entirely by what surrounds the trunk.

It stores the things a street needs to put somewhere

Snow cleared from a carriageway has to go somewhere, and a verge accepts it without blocking the footway or burying parked cars.

Utility apparatus, poles and cabinets sit in a verge without obstructing pedestrians, whereas on a paved footway each one narrows the usable width.

Excavation for services in soft ground is also cheaper and quicker to reinstate than the same trench through a bound surface.

Its costs are visible and its benefits are not

Mowing appears as a line in a maintenance budget, recurring several times a year and easy to identify as a saving.

The drainage capacity, tree health and storage a verge provides do not appear anywhere, because nobody is invoiced for them.

Paving over verges therefore looks like an efficiency, and the additional gully cleaning, flooding and tree replacement that follow are recorded separately.

Parking is what usually consumes them

Where kerbside space is short, verges are driven over, compacted and eventually surfaced, converting them into informal parking one property at a time.

Once compacted, they no longer infiltrate water and no longer support planting, so the function is lost well before the paving is laid.

Protecting the strip therefore requires a decision about parking supply, which is the underlying question that verge policy is standing in for.

Questions readers ask

Why do people cross against the signal when a crossing is right there?

Usually because the wait is long relative to the gaps in traffic. Behaviour tracks the cost of waiting far more closely than it tracks the rule.

Are staggered crossings safer than single-stage ones?

They simplify vehicle movement and shorten each exposure, but they lengthen the total wait and add a turn. The evidence depends heavily on the street, and neither form is better everywhere.

Streetscrossingswalkingsignalssafety
Amara Nwosu
Transit writer, Street to Sky

Amara writes about transit networks, frequency and the unglamorous business of headways.

Also by Amara Nwosu